Christopher over at the OFA and Break the Matrix made an impressive case for why the Creation/Evolution debate is central to this freedom movement. And after learning about the Darwinization of our legal system, in my research for the analysis of the Constitution Party Preamble, I believe it! It is the BIG LIE — one that that doesn’t have to make sense because it has been told over and over and over. Even some Christians are accepting compromise of scripture to reconcile it with this false science. But it is an essential tool of the establishment with devastating consequences for liberty.
The truth is that most people have not really given the subject matter a critical review. Most are inclined to believe one way or another so they gravitate toward sound bites that justify their predisposition – even in the liberty movement where so much deception has been progressively revealed to us. This reminds me of my favorite quote I saw on facebook by an OFA members:
“Always amazes me that so many ‘liberty minded’ people here who have been awakened to so many things in the last couple of years, yet still seem so determined to hang onto the indoctrination we’ve received in our coerced public education. Hmmmmmm….”
Simply put if all men are not created, then they are not equal. You cannot evolve equally. Darwin provides the justification for an eventual ruling class of experts that are “highly evolved” and “more advanced” than the rest of the masses.
Doesn’t this logical conclusion call for a deliberate and critical analysis of the facts? The resources below are short, inexpensive reads that take a critical, factual and common sense look at the evidence surrounding this debate.
If reason is your guide, then be guided by reason and “question even the existence of God,” but question it, analyze it, listen to the evidence and courageously let it lead you to the logical conclusion. You may come to understand why the debate is so vehemently suppressed.
THE FIRST BOOK:
The Case Against Darwin: Why the Evidence Should Be Examined
By James Perloff
Price: $4.32
The Case Against Darwin is James Perloff’s newest title on the creation-evolution debate. Written from a creationist perspective, this 83-page book is a primer for those unfamiliar with the subject, and too busy for a full-length book such as the author’s earlier Tornado in a Junkyard.
Perloff first explores the social impact of Darwinism to establish the relevance of the topic. Then, in layman’s language, he discusses the growing body of evidence that is invalidating Darwin’s theory of evolution: evidence from genetics, origins science, biochemistry, paleontology, taxonomy and molecular biology. Finally, he examines fallacies of certain evidences commonly said to support Darwin’s theory: Ernst Haeckel’s embryo drawings, vestigial organs, salt percentages in blood and seawater, babies born with “monkey tails,” peppered moths, microevolution, and similarity as a proof of common descent. Despite the scientific nature of the material, Perloff keeps it light and short, and most readers should find The Case Against Darwin an easy read.
Here are a few snippets:
Genetics – was not developed as a science in Darwin’s Day and he assumed animals had the unlimited capacity to adapt to environments. But a creature cannot be anything physically his genes will not allow. To resolve this dilemma, modern evolutionists assert that genes mutate and over eons. This is the explanation for how fish got the genes to eventually become humans. But mutations DELETE information from the genetic code, they never create higher, more complex information.
The Fossil Record – Despite billions of fossils from all groups of species, transitional fossils linking them are missing. The fossil record reveals animals complete when first seen and thus better supports creation than evolution.
Biochemistry – The human body has features, such as blood clotting and the immune system that are “irreducibly complex” and cannot have evolved.
Taxonomy – the science that classifies plants and animals, grouping them by characteristics they share. If all creatures have a common ancestor, we should not see distinctively divided groups, but living intermediaries between those groups. Taxonomy shows a lack of intermediaries between the major divisions of living creatures.
Common Sense – Why aren’t reptiles today growing feathers? Why aren’t fish today growing little legs, trying to adapt to land? Why aren’t invertebrates evolving into vertebrates? Why aren’t reptiles evolving into mammals?
Why is man so incredibly different from animals? What animal can solve complex math equations? Write poetry? Laugh at jokes? Design computer software? How can we say man is merely one more animal, just more highly evolved?
THE SECOND BOOK:
15 Reasons to Take Genesis as History
By Dr. Don Batten and Dr. Jonathan Sarfati
Price: $1.95
Many have been misled into thinking that the Genesis account of creation is not actual history but is just some sort of theological argument (“polemic”). This small book succinctly shows why those who believe in the inspiration of Scripture have no intellectually honest choice but to take Genesis as straight-forward history, just as Jesus did. It powerfully challenges one of the major problems in the church today that affects the authority of the entire Bible.
-
Jesus understood the Old Testament as history
-
Jesus regarded Adam, Eve and Noah as historical people
-
Genesis was written as history
-
The rest of the Old Testament takes Genesis as history
-
The New Testament takes Genesis as history
-
Genesis history is consistent with God’s nature
-
Genesis as history explains the origin of death and suffering
-
The Gospel presupposes the historical events of Genesis
-
A consistent Christian worldview depends on Genesis as history
-
Denying the history of Genesis disconnects Christianity from the “real world”
-
The early church leaders accepted the time frame and global flood of Genesis
-
The Reformers understood Genesis as history
-
Atheism requires naturalism —Christians should not deny Genesis as history in order to accommodate it
-
Abandoning Genesis as history leads to heresy and apostasy
-
Why not take Genesis as history? Only the fallible speculations of historical “science” stand in the way
